Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | 10% | 44% | 39% | 7% | |
| 2 | HABALA Peter | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% | |
| 3 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 5 | CHEN David A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 6 | ANDERSON Kristian S. | - | - | - | 7% | 51% | 41% | |
| 7 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 8 | PAVLOVICH Robert | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 9 | BANKS Alexander S. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% | |
| 10 | KOEHN Ted | - | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 11 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 75% | |
| 12 | MARTOS Darwin C. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | - |
| 13 | LEE Stephen K. | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 47% | 11% | |
| 14 | CHO Michael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 15 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 16 | HENDRICKS Ron | - | 3% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 51% | 30% |
| 18 | CAMERON Matt W. | - | 4% | 31% | 45% | 19% | 2% | |
| 19 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% |
| 20 | DIAZ HERNANDEZ Yasmany E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 48% | 43% | |
| 21 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 1% |
| 23 | WILLEY David S. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
| 24 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 1% | 14% | 52% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | WILBERT Matt | - | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 26 | GROSS Stephen R. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | GRISWOLD Doug | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 28 | FADL Omar | - | 8% | 37% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 29 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 30 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 38% | 4% | |
| 31 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 2% | 17% | 41% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | JONES Bryan T. | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
| 33 | LUONG Allen | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 34 | DRAKE David L. | - | 4% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 35 | VALENTINE Iain | 10% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 31% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | KLEIN Johannes | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | WU Clarence C. | 7% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | ALLAN Peter L. | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | NEWSON Frank | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | - | |
| 41 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 26% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | ZEISS Gary M. | 28% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | LEYLAND John | 51% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | POWERS Douglas A. | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 11% | 59% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WHITESIDES Scott M. | 12% | 49% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | YOO Terry S. | 48% | 44% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | STEINMAN Jack | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | 72% | 26% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 77% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.