Twin Cities Fencing Club - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
| 2 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita I. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | BERSCHEID Arthur | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 3 | ZINSER James | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% | |
| 5 | NAIDL Josiah | - | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 6 | MARTIN Wesley | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 7 | MENASCO Juliun | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | DING Zilin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 9 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 10 | ISHANOVA Sofia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 11 | HASHMI Mushaf | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 12 | REESE Rebecca M. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | HOPKINS Dylan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | MADSEN Lindsey | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 16 | YATES Graeme | 12% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | CAPERS Hunter | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 7% | |
| 18 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 19 | KWANT Henry | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | FLOOD Moe | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | FADLIA Murad | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 23 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | FEEHAN Conor | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ROY Griffin | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | HICKNER Gabe | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | LOVE Brianna | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | DAVIS Jace W. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 29 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | HEUER Weston | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BELL Andrew | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CHRISTENSEN Jack | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TELCI Arya | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | PETERSON Penelope | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | LEGGETT Emilia | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | CHAPMAN Graeme | 10% | 54% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | ZERR Daemin | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | SZUDY Gabe | < 1% | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | GRAY Elijah | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | NELSON Joseph | 1% | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.