Twin Cities Fencing Club - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
2 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 19% |
3 | SCHROEDER Karl A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 10% | |
3 | MISHRA Milan B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
5 | NWOKOCHA Chizoro | 100% | 97% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
6 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | |
7 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | |
8 | HONEK Kyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
9 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
10 | CHO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
11 | FRALEY Orion | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
12 | CULVER Hannah | 100% | 89% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
13 | HALULA Frank | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
14 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
15 | WALI Kaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
16 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | 1% | - | |
17 | SANFORD Wesley | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | |
18 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | 100% | 75% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
19 | NOONEY Tatum | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
20 | STONE Ken | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
21 | ELDRIDGE Hudson | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
22 | WILLER Ryan | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | SMITH Bram | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
24 | STENZEL Henry | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
25 | ANTONSON Kye | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.