Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 37% |
2 | FENG ge | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% |
3 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% | |
3 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% | |
5 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
6 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
7 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
8 | TCHERNYSHOV ANNA | - | 5% | 31% | 47% | 15% | 1% | |
9 | LI Fei | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 48% | |
10 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 48% | 41% |
11 | BANNERMAN Courtney | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
12 | WESER Veronica U. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
13 | DEPOMMIER-GONZALEZ Isabelle | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 38% | 7% |
14 | SAVNER Jessica L. | - | - | 1% | 17% | 67% | 16% | |
15 | CHA Eugenie | - | - | 2% | 19% | 53% | 27% | |
16 | PAN Angela | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
17 | GIELEGHEM Klaire | - | 3% | 30% | 56% | 11% | - | |
18 | TIBBETTS Lily | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
19 | BYRON Karen J. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
20 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
21 | NGUYEN Celena | 9% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
22 | COVINO Mila | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | SONG Charlotte | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
24 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - |
25 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | SKLAR Davida | 1% | 14% | 47% | 32% | 5% | - | |
27 | YU Eva | 1% | 19% | 54% | 24% | 2% | - | |
28 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 5% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | |
29 | SCHELTZ Kimberly | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
30 | ORDORICA Abra | 18% | 57% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
31 | BRODEUR Andrea | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
32 | JENSEN MJ | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | - |
33 | AGIREDDY Vanya | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
34 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
35 | ABRAMSON Liliana M. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
36 | MCMILLAN Helena | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
37 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | CROWDER Julia | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
39 | STOCKTON Catherine | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | ERIKSEN Kate | 64% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
41 | SUMMERER Jordan | 35% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | CURTIN Rebecca | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
43 | DARVAY Solomiya | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | DECATIFF Sophia | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.