Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 2 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | SLIKAS Beth | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 5 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 6 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | - | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% |
| 7 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 7% |
| 8 | CAREY Michele S. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | FERREIRA DA COSTA Claudia M. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 11 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 12 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 13 | COMES Rita | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | HUZEL Lisa | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
| 15 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 16 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RIOS Donna B. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | MAUL Judy L. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 21 | BODON Sandra L. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | ZAMARRON Anissa | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ROWLAND May | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WEISS Renee | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 26 | BYRON Karen J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SIENDA Angela J. | 4% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | GROCE Linda J. | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | TASKER Monisha B. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MASE Kerin | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WALTER Joanne | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | SMITH Dorothy | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LARSON Cheryl | 6% | 50% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.