Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 2 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | SLIKAS Beth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 5 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 6 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% |
| 7 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% |
| 8 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | FERREIRA DA COSTA Claudia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 11 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 12 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 13 | COMES Rita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 14 | HUZEL Lisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 15 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RIOS Donna B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 21 | BODON Sandra L. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | ZAMARRON Anissa | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WEISS Renee | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 26 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | SIENDA Angela J. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | GROCE Linda J. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | TASKER Monisha B. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MASE Kerin | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | SMITH Dorothy | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LARSON Cheryl | 100% | 94% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.