Manhattan Fencing of Englewood - Englewood, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Simon | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 50% | 9% | |
| 2 | ALUF William | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 58% |
| 3 | IP Hunter | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 3 | CHEN Ryan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 5 | WONG Jacob | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 6 | KIM Colin | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 7 | KAGAN Jacob | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | BARAKH Adam | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 9 | LEE Marcus | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 10 | VINCENT Yian | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | GANDHI Arhaan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | GUO Zi-Yang | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% | |
| 13 | ADOLPHUS March | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | SHI Henry | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | MUKHERJEE Rohan | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | DIAKONIDZE Elisee | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 17 | KAPLAN Max | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | CHANTENGCO John Stephen | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | BORROK Andrew | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | RAMIA Deven | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.