UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RAVI Arjun | V V V V V | V V V V V | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 2 | WILSON Andrew T. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LIU Oscar | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | JEONG Arisu | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 5 | TUCKER Evan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | KIM Daniel | D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | ARZT Nicholas | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | HWANG Brandon | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 9 | OLDHAM Aidan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 10 | ZHOU Alex | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 11 | OLSON Clayton M. | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | WRIGHT Alex | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | KEMLE Brian | V V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | PIERCE Chandon | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | GARBER Robert A. | V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 16 | KIM Sangone | D D V D D | V V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 17 | HICKS Matthew | D V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 19 | TAK Jemi | V D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | MACGREGOR Alexander | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | RAGHU Pranav | V D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | MEREDITH Jeffrey | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 23 | LEE Winston | D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | SOTTILE Cole | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | GEISSLER Maximilian | V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | LEE Sean | V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | ERIZE Alejandro | D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | SIGG Noah | D V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | YU Steven | D D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | GEMMELL Tyler | D V D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 31 | GUEVARA Bryan | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | REDDY Daksh | D D D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 33 | PARK Andrew | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 34 | ELEY Ellis | D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 35 | PARIENTE Avishi | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 36 | CATES Georgia | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 36 | WANG Aaron | D D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 38 | KAUZLARICH Nathaniel | V D D V D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 39 | GRANT Grayson | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 40 | LEPESQUEUR Hiago | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 41 | MENON Rahul | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 42 | HUANG Arthur | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 43 | LE BLANC Anna | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 44 | BANJA Michael | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 45 | KIM Sarah | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.