UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RAVI Arjun | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
2 | WILSON Andrew T. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
3 | LIU Oscar | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
3 | JEONG Arisu | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
5 | TUCKER Evan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 12% |
6 | KIM Daniel | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
7 | ARZT Nicholas | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
8 | HWANG Brandon | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
9 | OLDHAM Aidan | - | 3% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 6% |
10 | ZHOU Alex | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
11 | OLSON Clayton M. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
12 | WRIGHT Alex | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
13 | KEMLE Brian | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
13 | PIERCE Chandon | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
15 | GARBER Robert A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
16 | KIM Sangone | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
17 | HICKS Matthew | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
18 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
19 | TAK Jemi | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
20 | MACGREGOR Alexander | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
21 | RAGHU Pranav | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
22 | MEREDITH Jeffrey | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | LEE Winston | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
24 | SOTTILE Cole | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
25 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
26 | LEE Sean | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
27 | ERIZE Alejandro | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
28 | SIGG Noah | 1% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
28 | YU Steven | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
30 | GEMMELL Tyler | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
31 | GUEVARA Bryan | - | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
32 | REDDY Daksh | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
33 | PARK Andrew | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
34 | ELEY Ellis | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | PARIENTE Avishi | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
36 | CATES Georgia | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
36 | WANG Aaron | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
38 | KAUZLARICH Nathaniel | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
39 | GRANT Grayson | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
40 | LEPESQUEUR Hiago | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - | |
41 | MENON Rahul | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
42 | HUANG Arthur | 8% | 53% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
43 | LE BLANC Anna | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | BANJA Michael | 3% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | KIM Sarah | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.