Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 2 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
| 3 | AKSAMIT Monica | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 5 | RUSSO Francesca | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 6 | KAKHIANI Teodora | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 8 | KONG Vera | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 9 | YANG Hengyu | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 10 | SHEN Chen | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 13 | SHAO Yaqi | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | THEODORE Maria A. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 47% | 20% | |
| 15 | SHELTON Aleksandra | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
| 16 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 19 | FU Ying | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 21 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 22 | LIANG Megan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | QIAN Jiarui | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 25 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Zoe | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 27 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | OISHI Megumi | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | HE Charlotte | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | JULIEN Michelle | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 33 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 34 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 35 | MA Yingjia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 36 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 37 | MICHEL Violet N. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 38 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 39 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 40 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 41 | YUN Maya | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | KIM Catherine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | STONE Hava S. | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | LU Vivian Y. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | TANG Catherine H. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | YONG Erika E. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 52 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 53 | DRAGON Rainer | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | YUN Joy | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 55 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | BERMAN Stella | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 57 | JIA Xiaoye | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | POSSICK Lola P. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
| 59 | TONG Kunling | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 60 | MERZA Celina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 61 | MOYA Keona L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 62 | MERZA Sarah | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 62 | KALRA Himani V. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | GHOSH Priyanka | 8% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 67 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 68 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 69 | TZOU Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 70 | LI Anna | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 71 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 72 | CHANG Josephine S. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | SAYLES Nina R. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LUCHO Raisza | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 77 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 78 | ROH Rachel E. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | WU Erica L. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 81 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 81 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 84 | TUCKER Iman R. | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | YUCEL Emine I. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | REDDY Shreya | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | DANAHY Ellen D. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 89 | MARSEE Samantha | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 90 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 90 | GULATI Ria | 4% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | LACSON Sarah | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | AKARD Micah M. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 95 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 97 | NEIBART Fiona | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | GLUCK Myriam | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | KOO Samantha | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | YODER Bridget H. | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 102 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | DEMING Clare L. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.