Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
| 2 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 40% |
| 3 | AKSAMIT Monica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 5 | RUSSO Francesca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 6 | KAKHIANI Teodora | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 7 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 8 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 9 | YANG Hengyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 10 | SHEN Chen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
| 11 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 13 | SHAO Yaqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 20% | |
| 15 | SHELTON Aleksandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
| 16 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 19 | FU Ying | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 21 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 22 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | QIAN Jiarui | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 25 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 27 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 33 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 34 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 35 | MA Yingjia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 36 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 37 | MICHEL Violet N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 38 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 39 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 40 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 41 | YUN Maya | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 45 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 46 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 52 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 53 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 55 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 56 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 57 | JIA Xiaoye | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% | |
| 59 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 60 | MERZA Celina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 61 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 62 | MERZA Sarah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 62 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 65 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 67 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 69 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 70 | LI Anna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 71 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 72 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 73 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 74 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LUCHO Raisza | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 77 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 78 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 79 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 81 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
| 84 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 85 | YUCEL Emine I. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 86 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | DANAHY Ellen D. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 89 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 90 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 90 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | AKARD Micah M. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 95 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 97 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 102 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.