Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOORE Shomari | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 46% | 36% |
| 2 | XIA Dashan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | MACARTY Jordan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 5 | MAO Benjamin | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 6 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% | |
| 7 | ARAVIND Athreya | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 8 | KOEPPEL Levi | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | KIM Henry | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
| 10 | CASERTANO Lorenzo | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 11 | TSE Maxwell | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 12 | CHEN Leonardo | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 13 | FULLER George | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 14 | RIM Eugene | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 15 | SHA Michael | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | COHEN Jared | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | YU Samuel | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | CHEIAN Dinis | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 19 | KAPLAN Maddox | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | KRAVIT Connor BE | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 47% | 20% |
| 21 | MANN Jake | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 22 | CAI Brian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 23 | CHEN Allen | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CARPENTER Liam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% |
| 25 | COCCHINI Lorenzo | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | MCGRATH Sean | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | CHEN Edward | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | POLSTER Joshua | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | WONG King-Yee | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | PAPADOPOULOS Maria | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 2% |
| 34 | HILBERT Gabriel | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 35 | ACAR Devin | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | AU Joshua | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | NILSEN Mark | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | PIASIO Jack | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 39 | CHEN YiHeng | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | CHEN Jayden | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 9% |
| 42 | DANIEL Camron | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 42 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | LATORA Nicholas | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | RVACHEV Michael | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 13% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | KHOURY-LEVY Nicholas | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | VAN BREEMS Martin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 49 | HE Yurui | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | TATE William Isom | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | WEHMEYER Devin | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CHOI Paul | - | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 53 | WONG Maximus | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 54 | LIN Yufei | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | SANCHEZ-BUSTOS Anasazi | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | ESPINOZA SANTARIA rodrigo sebastian | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ROMERO Javier | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 59 | NG Nico | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | KOGAN Yelisey | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | WEAVER David | 4% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.