Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HOMER Daryl D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | DODDO Andrew | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
3 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
5 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
5 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
7 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
8 | SARON Mitchell S. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
9 | WESTERN Rafael | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
10 | DI TELLA Pascual M. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | MA Jonathan D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | BOOTH Zaheer | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | TE VELDE Noah C. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | PARK Donghwan | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
15 | PERRIER Clement | D D D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
16 | STONE Ben | V D D D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
17 | WALKER Christopher J. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
18 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | SOUDERS Peter F. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
20 | HARLEY Colby A. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
21 | SHAINBERG Jonah L. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
22 | REESE Aaron S. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
23 | IGOE Benjamin | D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | KARAM Tariq A. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | SKEETE Kamar A. | V V V V D D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
26 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | D V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
27 | SIERADZKY Dawson | V D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
28 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
29 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
30 | BARNETT Adam | V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
31 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
32 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
33 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | SPEAR Jeff | D V V V V V | D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
35 | ATTIG Will T. | V V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
36 | COSTIN Michael V. | D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
37 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | D V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
38 | HOLMES Aiden G. | D V V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
39 | SHIN Richard J.H. | D D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
40 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | V V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
41 | LIANG Connor | V V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
42 | YANG Ziyi | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
43 | LAI Adam J. | V D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
44 | LEUNG Mark | V D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
45 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | D V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
46 | MARSEE James | D D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
47 | PORTMANN Stein J. | D V V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
48 | ZU Kevin | V V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | D V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
50 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | V D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
51 | MIKA Casper | V D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
52 | ESCUETA Tony V. | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
53 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
54 | HONG Marshall Q. | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
54 | MEHTA Sachin N. | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
56 | KIM Sean G. | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
57 | BOLTON Dawson E. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
57 | DODRILL Grant | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
59 | BOLTON Braydon A. | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
60 | DEMAREST Iain | V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
61 | MOON Sean H. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
62 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
63 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
64 | HU William | D D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
65 | LI Joshua L. | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
66 | HUSSAIN Faaris | D D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
67 | JULIEN William A | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
68 | CHEN Howard | D D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
68 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
70 | DOARES Andrew | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
71 | LASORSA Matthew | D D V V D D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 | |
72 | PRIEST Leighton K. | D D V V D D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 | |
73 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | V D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
74 | FALLICK Ozzie | D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
75 | TONG Qilin | D D D V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
76 | BRADFORD Blake | V D D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
77 | CLARKSON Cole | V D D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
78 | SMITH David C. | V D D D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
79 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
80 | COTTER Liam | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
80 | KIM Benjamin H. | D D V D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
80 | BARBER William S. | D V D D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
80 | SINGER Carson | D V D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
84 | MICHELL Bailey | D D D D V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
85 | JEAN Noe T. | D D V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
86 | WESLER Logan A. | V D D D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
87 | RAJA Arnav | D D D D D V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
88 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
89 | CICHOCKI David K. | D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
90 | KIM Minwook | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
91 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
92 | YAN Jack P. | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
93 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.