Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOMER Daryl D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 2 | DODDO Andrew | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 3 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 3 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 5 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 7 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 51% | 15% |
| 8 | SARON Mitchell S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 56% |
| 9 | WESTERN Rafael | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 10 | DI TELLA Pascual M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 11 | MA Jonathan D. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 7% |
| 12 | BOOTH Zaheer | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 5% | |
| 13 | TE VELDE Noah C. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | PARK Donghwan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | PERRIER Clement | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | STONE Ben | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | WALKER Christopher J. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 52% | 25% | |
| 18 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 19 | SOUDERS Peter F. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 20 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | SHAINBERG Jonah L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 58% |
| 22 | REESE Aaron S. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | IGOE Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% | |
| 23 | KARAM Tariq A. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 13% | |
| 25 | SKEETE Kamar A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 26 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 27 | SIERADZKY Dawson | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 28 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 1% |
| 30 | BARNETT Adam | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 14% | |
| 34 | SPEAR Jeff | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 35 | ATTIG Will T. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
| 36 | COSTIN Michael V. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 37 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | SHIN Richard J.H. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | LIANG Connor | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | YANG Ziyi | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LAI Adam J. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 44 | LEUNG Mark | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 46 | MARSEE James | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ZU Kevin | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
| 49 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MIKA Casper | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | HONG Marshall Q. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 56 | KIM Sean G. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | BOLTON Dawson E. | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | DODRILL Grant | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | DEMAREST Iain | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | MOON Sean H. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 62 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 63 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 64 | HU William | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 65 | LI Joshua L. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | JULIEN William A | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 68 | CHEN Howard | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 19% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | DOARES Andrew | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 71 | LASORSA Matthew | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 74 | FALLICK Ozzie | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | TONG Qilin | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 76 | BRADFORD Blake | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 77 | CLARKSON Cole | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 78 | SMITH David C. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | COTTER Liam | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Benjamin H. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | BARBER William S. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | SINGER Carson | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 84 | MICHELL Bailey | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 85 | JEAN Noe T. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 86 | WESLER Logan A. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | RAJA Arnav | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 89 | CICHOCKI David K. | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 90 | KIM Minwook | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 91 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | YAN Jack P. | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 93 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.