USC Physical Education Building - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 2 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SMITH Justin C. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 5 | SHUR Yakov C. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | AU Marcus J. | V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 10 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | BAXTER David | V V V D V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 12 | LEE Royce | V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 13 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | SHAHRIL Natalia | V D D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | HARRISON Amelia H. | D V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 16 | WELBORN Kathrina | D D D D V | V V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 17 | DENISON Declan | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | KANE Chloe | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | FERRIERE Joshua | V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 20 | IMSANDE Dylan | V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 21 | CHARETTE Matthew | V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | CHIEN Brandon | D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | CHARETTE Alex | V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | GAUTHIER-PARKER Harrison | V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | ALLEN David | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | LIN Ryan | D D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
| 28 | WOO Lucas | V D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | JENSEN David | D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | SOLONOVICH Maksim | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | SODERBERG Alix | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | MAI Mailan | D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 34 | TAN Jocelyn | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 35 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 36 | CREASON Nicholas | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | KOU Mason | V V D V D | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 37 | KOUTSOUKOS James | V V D D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 39 | HEPLER Sarah | V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | FERRIERE Thomas | D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | BELL Michael S. | D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 42 | SCHERZAY Ian | D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 43 | GULLY Wren | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 44 | HAU Olivia | D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | DINGMAN Nash | D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 46 | MISRA Tara | V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 47 | GRAFF Adam | D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | KNIGHT Alex | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 49 | KAMINAGA Josephine | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | HAWKINS Simon | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 51 | LABOVITCH David | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 52 | WANG Lawrence | D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 53 | CHANG Minchun | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 54 | GURROLA Michal | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 55 | GALLIVAN James | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 56 | SIU Annalisa | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.