Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Garrett | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 2 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 3 | FAUCHER James | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 3 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 5 | MOZZER Nolan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 6 | CHAVES Evan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 7 | LEE Harrison | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 8 | MOSHIER Calvin | 12% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | HOLCOMB Liam | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 10 | SONPAL Winslow | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
| 11 | MA Brendon | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | HOLBROOK Silas | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 13 | HAN Nathan | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | MANN Daniel | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 15 | ZBYSZYNSKI Owen | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 16 | ASHLEY Logan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 17 | LAZORISAK Andrew | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 18 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 19 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 20 | SHI Evan | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 21 | VIGODA Max | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 22 | MCGANN Grant | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ROFINO Samuel | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CIANCHETTA David | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | LANDMAN Martin | 9% | 27% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.