Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YEN Darren | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | LIN John A. | V D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | MICHELL Bailey | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | MOON Sean H. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | LIM Ryan | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | LINSKY Matthew | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | CHOI Hyunseok | D D D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 9 | SAKHAMURI Surya | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | YEN Preston | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 11 | CONROY Jonathan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | RAMAN Easwer | V V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 13 | CONROY Nicholas | V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 14 | STEVENS Jim | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | RAI Avin | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 16 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | D V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 17 | MAHONEY Colin M. | V D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | CZAHA Balint | V V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 19 | TRAVERS Samir | V V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | SEVOSTYANOV Stepan (Seva) | V V V D D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 21 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | D D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | FEENEY Sean | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | LO Joshua | V V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 24 | PEDERSEN Leif | D V D D V V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 25 | KAHN Justin M. | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 27 | BUEKER Samuel P. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | MORRIS Samuel A. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 29 | MALDARI Frank | D V D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 30 | TUPPER Edward A. | D V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 31 | HAMMER Peter A. | D V D V D D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 32 | ATEFI Daniel | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | SANTOS Thales | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | CHO Sungmin | V D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 36 | CARTER Jackson | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | SHERR Cameron E. | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | KEEFE Duncan | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 39 | LUO ZiRui | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 40 | WANG Ziyao | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 41 | WEHLE Paul | D D D D D V | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 42 | MACGREGOR Colin D. | D V D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 43 | DWORTZ William | D D D D V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
| 44 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | D D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
| 45 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 46 | SHAO Peter | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 47 | LO Alexander | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 48 | PIWOWAR Alex | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 49 | FRUEHAUF Bradley | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.