NEUSFA 2019 Pomme De Terre Individual

Senior Men's Foil

Sunday, June 16, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HODGES Carter F. - - - - 1% 17% 82%
2 WELCH Kyle J. - - 1% 8% 27% 44% 20%
3 YANG Adam - - 3% 17% 38% 33% 10%
3 ZHANG Daniel D. - - - 3% 16% 44% 37%
5 ANDRADE Nicholas - - - 1% 12% 53% 35%
6 LIU Niles J. - - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
7 IBRAHIM Marwan - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
8 HOLMES Andrew E. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
9 HOLMES Stuart S. - - - 1% 6% 32% 61%
10 LI Brian H. - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
10 EMMER Chase T. - - - 1% 12% 43% 44%
12 HAN YiMing - - - - 6% 50% 44%
13 KOECK Tomas E. - - 4% 19% 38% 32% 7%
14 HUANG Bin - - - - 6% 50% 44%
15 SLEDESKI Andrew - 2% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3%
16 ZUSIN Zachary W. - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
17 WANG Brian S. - - 3% 15% 37% 34% 11%
18 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. - - - 2% 15% 45% 38%
19 HAMILTON Bogdan A. - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 17%
19 PRINCE Nicholas J. - 2% 8% 23% 34% 25% 8%
21 SULLIVAN Jackson R. - 1% 10% 29% 38% 20% 2%
22 RITCHIE Luke W. - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 18%
23 CHENG Thomas C. - - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
24 HEWES Thomas - - 1% 11% 39% 38% 11%
25 LI Brandon - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 17%
26 ANDREWS Nathan J. - - 2% 12% 35% 38% 14%
27 DING Allan - - - 7% 32% 49% 12%
27 ACINAPURO Philip M. 1% 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
30 LUTAR Lucas N. - - - 1% 8% 45% 47%
31 GEE Brandon - 2% 8% 23% 34% 25% 7%
32 BADRIGIAN William H. 1% 9% 34% 42% 14% 1% -
33 PETER Griffin - 3% 14% 29% 32% 18% 4%
34 ADLER David R. - - 1% 10% 36% 40% 12%
35 LIU Patrick - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
36 SCHENCK Koen M. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
37 MA Alexander - - 3% 20% 43% 28% 5%
38 CRALEY Thomas - 1% 13% 44% 33% 8% -
38 MCGILLION-MOORE Jake - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
40 DOBBINS Evan - 3% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
41 STANLEY Mason B. - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17% 2%
42 LIU Jonathan 1% 6% 24% 38% 24% 7% 1%
44 BREIER Matthew F. 1% 13% 34% 36% 15% 1% -
45 CORTIZAS Jack 1% 11% 34% 37% 15% 2% -
46 SEAH Chad 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
47 LE Vyn A. 2% 17% 39% 32% 10% 1% -
48 DING Jonathan 2% 18% 37% 32% 11% 1% -
49 LIN Richard W. - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
50 LIU Kevin - 4% 15% 30% 31% 16% 3%
51 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - 4% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
52 MELCHER Jack H. - 2% 12% 38% 43% 5% -
52 JIMENEZ Diran - - 5% 20% 41% 31% 3%
54 BROOKES Scott L. - 3% 20% 46% 25% 5% -
54 LAROSEE Matthew D. 2% 11% 27% 32% 20% 7% 1%
56 BATRAK Alexander 1% 6% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
57 SIEGEL Elliot - 1% 10% 31% 41% 17% 1%
59 KAZA Nitish 1% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
60 LIU Eric P. - 2% 14% 33% 35% 14% 1%
61 CHESTNA Sam 7% 29% 37% 21% 5% 1% -
62 KASI Sanjay - 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 2%
63 HU Oliver W. - - 2% 12% 29% 37% 19%
64 HU Robin 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
65 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. 1% 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
66 ZHOU Timmy 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
67 MILLER Andrew 8% 34% 43% 14% 2% - -
68 YE Kevin E. 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
69 SHA Yi Peng 6% 30% 41% 20% 3% - -
70 HOWELL Thomas A. 1% 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% -
71 ARTIS Tre D. 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
72 MOO Gareth G. 12% 41% 33% 11% 2% - -
73 DU Samuel R. 1% 14% 34% 35% 14% 1% -
75 MARSHALL Ian 2% 16% 36% 33% 12% 1% -
76 SANTULLI Tristan 14% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
77 MILLER Trent D. 7% 24% 35% 24% 9% 2% -
78 BICKFORD Michael 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1% -
79 FU Yifan 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
80 SHIN Joshua J. 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
81 TSAI Philip W. 6% 24% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
82 SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. 1% 17% 49% 27% 6% 1% -
83 BRINTON III Robert H. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
84 AHN Andrew 3% 17% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
85 LIGH Thomas - 4% 20% 37% 28% 9% 1%
86 WOHLERS Casey 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -
87 VARGAS Hector W. 13% 36% 35% 14% 3% - -
88 BANKS Alexander S. 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5% -
88 TSAI Max W. 10% 46% 33% 9% 1% - -
90 IVARSSON Oliver - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
91 WITTENBERG Jackson H. 9% 35% 39% 15% 2% - -
92 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
93 BOISLARD Adam J. 11% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
94 HOWARD Alexander 9% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
95 ALIMI Yacine A. 5% 29% 45% 18% 3% - -
96 ZHAO Jesse 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
97 FERNANDEZ-PRADA Kenneth (Ken) D. 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
98 QI Steve 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -
99 LIGH Jack 5% 23% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
100 WILBERT Matt 11% 47% 34% 7% - - -
101 CAMAYO-ROSERO Andres Camilo 26% 44% 24% 5% 1% - -
102 HONDOR Robert D. 37% 42% 17% 3% - - -
102 SPOSATO Luke 38% 42% 16% 3% - - -
104 HOWARD Michael 9% 38% 36% 14% 3% - -
105 CHU Tristan L. 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
106 WIEST Henry 34% 42% 19% 4% - - -
107 WANG Jonathan 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
107 JIN Dennis H. 24% 50% 23% 2% - - -
109 ROTHCHILD Matthew 50% 38% 11% 1% - - -
110 ROADY Tyler J. 10% 35% 39% 15% 1% - -
110 GUO Hairuo 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.