Texas Fencing Academy - Austin, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOCHARD Dimitri F. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 29% |
2 | SON Kevin | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
3 | LEE William | 25% | 39% | 25% | 8% | 2% | < 1% | - |
3 | JORDAN Bryce | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 1% |
5 | CHAKRABORTY Ankit | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 22% | 3% |
6 | CLINE Toshi | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
7 | CRAVEY Michael L. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
8 | KASKAN Peter E. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 34% | 3% |
9 | RANGE Alexander | 6% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 2% | < 1% | - |
10 | CARDOZA Tomas | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 2% |
11 | ALI Yosef | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | KIM Euijin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
13 | TRAN Duc | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | - |
14 | PARMER Alex | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 52% | 20% |
15 | LE Nathan | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
16 | NGUYEN Bao | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
17 | ORIA Isabel | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
18 | PHAM Elaine | 1% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
19 | ROSS Joe | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
20 | HERNANDEZ Alexander | - | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | LAVALLE Lincoln | - | 1% | 13% | 52% | 29% | 5% | - |
22 | JENSEN Jonathan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
23 | WINGLER Chris | 10% | 46% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
24 | CASTILLO Abigail | 8% | 46% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
25 | MATHEWS Rand | < 1% | 4% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
26 | SHAH Sarina | 17% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
27 | MISHKIN Lincoln | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | OCHOA Olivia | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.