Columbus - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DISIMONE David Z. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | KAROLAK Dale W. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | ZHANG Michael | D V D D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 5 | IGNATIK Piotr | V V V D V V | V V D | 1.7 | 5 | +3.3 |
| 6 | MASON Alexander T. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 7 | CULLEY Matthew | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | DAVIS Jennifer | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 9 | JOBE Connor | V V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | EVERT Todd | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | FRIEDMAN Andres | D V D V V V | V D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 12 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | BOSLER-KILMER Joel C. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | LINDOW Connor | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | HUNKER Frederick | V V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | D D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 17 | HERDMAN Julian | V D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 18 | HUGHES Evan | D V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 19 | CHU Duong | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 20 | ZHANG James | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 21 | HOLDORF LE GOFF Bianca | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 22 | PRIJATEL John R. | D D D V D D | D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 23 | VERWORN Jonathan | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 24 | BROWN Jordan | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 25 | GUSKA Jenn | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 26 | SEBENS Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 27 | LYNCH Stephen | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 28 | ADAMS Christopher | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.