The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 3 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 3 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | < 1% |
| 5 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 6 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 7 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 8 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | GAURAVDEEP Aj | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 11 | HEINS Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 12 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | SIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | CHU Theodore | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 16 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 17 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
| 18 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 22 | NG Biwon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | XU Yanwen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 26 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | NGUYEN Peyton | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | ZGAMA Oleksii | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | WONG Preston | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | HERSH Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | PREN Evan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | LI Sean | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HU Jingsen | 100% | 86% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | NAIK Saininad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
| 41 | DEVINENI Avyang | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | QIAO James | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | QUARANTA James | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | HEDGES Lucas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 45 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 6% |
| 46 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | DINGMAN Nash | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | HUANG Jen-Chieh | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 49 | COTTER Robert M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.