New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 11% |
2 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
3 | WU Celine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
3 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
5 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 27% |
6 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
7 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
8 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
9 | ZHOU olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
10 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
11 | LIAW Elaine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
12 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
14 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
15 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 17% |
16 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
17 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
18 | CHAGARES Isabella | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
19 | KAZA Nitya V. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
20 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
21 | SEAH Dana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
22 | AO Alyssa | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
24 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
25 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
26 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
27 | GAO Anna | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
28 | ADVINCULA Allegra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
29 | PARSONS Leada | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
30 | WANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
31 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
34 | CHEN Thea | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
35 | SCHULTZ Norah | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
36 | VENKATESH Isha | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | WANG Jolie Z. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | MORGESON Olivia | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
40 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
41 | DALBERG Meadow | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | DALBERG Violet | 100% | 93% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.