Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | DIMMETT David C. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | WOODLEY Colin | V D V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 5 | YANG Gary | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | WALLACE George | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | PETERS Nathan M. | V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 8 | BARTLETT Lauren | V D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 9 | CARTER Austin L. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | LIN Harrison | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | HU Robert J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | SHOWALTER Zachary | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | WATSON Raymond | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | BOZARTH Alex | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 18 | MILLSON Daniel | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 19 | ZOOK Evan D. | V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | HALES Adam | D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 21 | CAMPBELL Paul | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 22 | HOROWITZ Logan | D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | CLAY Cameron | V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 24 | BENUCCI Vincent | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | KARNAVAS William | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | MOORE Mary | D V D V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 27 | DILDA Griffin | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 28 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | SWENSON Jason | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | MILLNER Brian | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | LUNDEN Espen | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 32 | BADLANI Neel | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | KRECK Marie | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 35 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 36 | AKKALE Reyhan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.