New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 2 | HO Kaden M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 3 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% | |
| 5 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 6 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 7 | OH Triton | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 8 | PENG Bryan | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHANG Yufeng | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 10 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 11 | WANG Robert | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | HAN Daniel Y. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% | |
| 15 | RODE Leon J. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 50% | 21% | |
| 16 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | MARGULIES William | - | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 18 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 19 | CHENG Cody | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | WONG Ryan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 21 | KASPER Aaron | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | |
| 23 | DOLAN Charles R. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | SAVOY Luca | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 25 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% | |
| 25 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 28 | WEN Edward | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | OWENS Harrison J. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 30 | ZHUANG Rayken | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Oscar | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | BAE Jason I. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 34 | LEONARD Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 36 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 37 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 38 | ZHANG Yankun | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | HUANG Tom | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 40 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | |
| 40 | LEMPERT Adam | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 42 | PERRON Robert | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 45 | SHTEIN Yan | - | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 46 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 47 | PIWOWAR Alex | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | ALTILAR BARTU | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 49 | SMITH Vaughn | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | HUANG Connor | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 51 | STURN Oliver | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 52 | MOULTON Ian | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | HONG Robert | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SHI Erick | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | TIAGI Daniel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | MORALES Jonathan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 57 | BRANDT Jaden | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | WU Hunter | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 58 | WASSERMAN Aiden | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | KILGALLEN William | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 61 | VOSS Jeffer | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | POSY Daniel | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | LAM Jeffrey Y. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 64 | GONG Jerry | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | STOLPER Max | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | MAZURENKO Alexander | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 67 | OSSMANN Archer | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | TAUER Sam | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | GOLD Carter | 11% | 45% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | CHAMPAGNE Connor | 16% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | MILLER Guy | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | DAI William | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | TANG Charles | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.