New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
2 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
3 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
3 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | |
5 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
6 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
7 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
8 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
9 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
10 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
11 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
12 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
14 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% | |
15 | RODE Leon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
16 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% | |
17 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
18 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
19 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
21 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - | |
22 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | |
23 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
25 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 29% | |
25 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
28 | WEN Edward | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
29 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
30 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | - | |
31 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
34 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
35 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
36 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
37 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
38 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
40 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
40 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
42 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
44 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 9% |
45 | SHTEIN Yan | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
46 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
47 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
48 | ALTILAR BARTU | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
49 | SMITH Vaughn | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
50 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
51 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
52 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
53 | HONG Robert | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
54 | SHI Erick | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
55 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
56 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
57 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
58 | WU Hunter | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
58 | WASSERMAN Aiden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
60 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
61 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
62 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
63 | LAM Jeffrey Y. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
64 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | STOLPER Max | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
66 | MAZURENKO Alexander | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
67 | OSSMANN Archer | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
68 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
68 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 89% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
70 | CHAMPAGNE Connor | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
71 | MILLER Guy | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
72 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
72 | DAI William | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
72 | TANG Charles | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
75 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.