New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 2 | DENYSE Jameson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 3 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 6% | |
| 3 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 5 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 6 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 7 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 8 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 9 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 10 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 11 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 12 | PAN Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 13 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 11% |
| 14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 15 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 16 | LOUIE Timothy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 17 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 35% |
| 18 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 19 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 20 | SEAH Chad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 45% |
| 21 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 22 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 23 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 24 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | |
| 25 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 26 | FU Yifan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 27 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 28 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 30 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 32 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 33 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
| 34 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 35 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 36 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 37 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 38 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 39 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 41 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | WANG JONATHAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 45 | ADVINCULA Dash | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 46 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | QI Steve | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 14% | 1% |
| 48 | KEANNA Peter | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 50 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 56 | WEI William | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 98% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 60 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ZHONG Guoren | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 64% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 66 | MORGESON Colin | 100% | 86% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | BURNS Andrew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 68 | DONG sean | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | GAO Anthony | 100% | 95% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | SZE Timothy | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | HUGHES Brady | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 73 | AMBROISE James | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 74 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 75 | TOGNERI Charles | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | HU Jason | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | MAGIDSON Josh | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | SNAPE Jamieson | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 78 | O'NEILL Quinn | 100% | 91% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | HASSETT Thomas | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | VENKATESH Aditya | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 82 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ADAMS Max | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | MCQUIDE elliot | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 85 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | PELT Ethan T. | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | ASHER Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 88 | CHAKRABARTI Eeshan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.