New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHO Brandon | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | MENSAH Kennedy C | V D D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | CZAHA Balint | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | KOGAN Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 5 | YEN Preston | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | ELIN Adam E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
| 7 | MAHONEY Colin M. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | HAN Daniel Y. | D V D V V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | GINIS Nathan | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 10 | MICHNA Colin P. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | DA GRACA Aidan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 14 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 15 | MARGULIES William | V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 16 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 17 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 18 | KASPER Aaron | V V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ATEFI Daniel | V V D V D V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 20 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | OVERDECK Andrew | V D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | BELEV Nicholas | V V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | LO Alexander | D V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | D V D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | HUANG Alexander C. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | TREJO Oliver | V D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 28 | PIWOWAR Alex | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | HUANG Tyler T. | D V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 31 | GINSBURG Daniel | D D D D V V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 32 | DOLAN Charles R. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | BIDWELL Ryder | D V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 34 | DOLSKI Jack | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 35 | FARDELLA Angelo | V D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 36 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 37 | HONG Justin | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 39 | GRYCIUK Koby | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 40 | HUANG Connor | D V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 41 | ZHUANG Rayken | D D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 42 | MACKINNON Henry | D D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 43 | KESSLER Josh | V D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 44 | WONG Ryan | D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 45 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | D V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 46 | DUNAL Daniel | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 47 | ZHANG Yankun | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 48 | SHTEIN Yan | V D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 49 | BURDAN Gabriel | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | RENNER Henry | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 51 | SHI Erick | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 52 | MORALES Jonathan | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 52 | BOVE Roman | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 54 | OWENS Harrison J. | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 55 | WU Max | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 56 | ELLIS John (Jack) | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 57 | GILBERT Spencer E. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 58 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 59 | HUANG Ian | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
| 60 | BRIDGES Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 61 | SUSSMAN Jamie | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 62 | BERG Patrick | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.