New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
2 | OWENS Celine A. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
3 | NG Sarah W. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
3 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% | |
5 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
6 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
7 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
8 | CHEN Celina Z. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
10 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
11 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
12 | JIN Olivia P. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
13 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
14 | HESSLER Hope L. | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 2% | |
15 | YU Melinda | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
16 | BILILIES Sophia | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
17 | MAGLIATO Julia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
18 | SU Emma | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
19 | HORAN Alexa | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
20 | SADOVA Olga | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
20 | NGUYEN Ella | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
22 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 2% | |
23 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
24 | ILYIN Anna | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
26 | HUANG Caroline | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
27 | DONG Zihan | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
28 | JIANG Paula | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
29 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
30 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
31 | BILLETER Mary | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
32 | HE Lizbeth | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
33 | YAN Ava | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
34 | WHALEN Paige C. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
35 | LIGH Karis | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | NAYAK Anika | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
37 | SAHNI Sophia | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | CHO Adella | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
39 | SULLIVAN Kate | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
40 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | JOHNSTON Lily | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
42 | CHU Laura | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
43 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 41% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.