New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | OWENS Celine A. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | NG Sarah W. | D V V V V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 3 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | NEWELL Alexia C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | XIKES Katherine E. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | SHIH Christina | V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | CHEN Celina Z. | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 9 | KRYLOVA Valery | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | V D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 11 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | JIN Olivia P. | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | LIGH Erenei J. | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 14 | HESSLER Hope L. | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | YU Melinda | D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | BILILIES Sophia | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 17 | MAGLIATO Julia | V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 18 | SU Emma | V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 19 | HORAN Alexa | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | SADOVA Olga | D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | NGUYEN Ella | V V D D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 22 | LEE Sophia | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | YUAN Greta | D D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 24 | ILYIN Anna | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | OBRADOVIC Ana | V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | HUANG Caroline | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | DONG Zihan | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | JIANG Paula | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | SULLIVAN Caroline | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 30 | LU Elaine | D D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 31 | BILLETER Mary | V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | HE Lizbeth | D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
| 33 | YAN Ava | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | WHALEN Paige C. | D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 35 | LIGH Karis | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 36 | NAYAK Anika | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | SAHNI Sophia | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 38 | CHO Adella | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 39 | SULLIVAN Kate | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 40 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 41 | JOHNSTON Lily | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | CHU Laura | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.