The UT-Austin Student Rec Center - Austin, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 2 | JAUME Andrei | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 36% | 6% | |
| 3 | ACUNA Gabriel G. | - | - | 2% | 23% | 48% | 26% | |
| 3 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | - | 5% | 30% | 47% | 18% | |
| 5 | MEJIA Matthew D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
| 6 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
| 7 | QUINONES Diego A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
| 8 | DORE Davis | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
| 9 | CHEZ Nolan | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 10 | KIM Aiden | - | - | 9% | 45% | 37% | 8% | |
| 11 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 38% | 6% | |
| 12 | FINLEY Dylan | - | - | 2% | 20% | 49% | 29% | |
| 13 | THAYER Jake T. | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 14 | MCKINLEY Luke | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | CHENG Mason | 2% | 17% | 50% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | SULTER Aurelie | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 17 | BARRETT Austin | - | 2% | 26% | 46% | 24% | 2% | |
| 18 | WOODALL Ian L. | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | COLLUMS Keegan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 20 | KASKAN Peter E. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 1% | |
| 21 | JUAN DIEGO Mendez | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 22 | DING Jennifer | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | ONG Ethan | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 24 | WONG Kai Yui | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 3% | |
| 25 | LESNIAK Chuck | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 21% | 2% | |
| 26 | LUONG Dillon | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | PEACHER Benjamin | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | SENISCH Isaac | 1% | 13% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | RAO Saathvik | 57% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | RUDOLPH Max B. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 3% | 35% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | CHEN Kevin | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | WILLINGHAM Jacqueline | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | SEMLER Benjamin | 51% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | JAMAIL Luke | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | OVERCASH II James (Coot) C. | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | THOMPSON Joshua | 36% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | RONG Frank | 10% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SAENZ David | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | KUCZAJ, IV John (Quade) | 24% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | WANG Borui | 9% | 46% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | OLIVARES Jasmine | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | DAILEY Adam | 5% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.