Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
2 | BAXTER Daniel J. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% | |
3 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
3 | MCNAMARA Scott | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
5 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
6 | MAKMATOV Vadim | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 32% | 2% |
7 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
8 | KURYLO Steven | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% |
9 | SUVEG Bela | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
10 | POPOKH Leo | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
11 | SHAW Trevor | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
12 | PORTA Alvise | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
13 | HELGE James R. | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
14 | PERKA Michael | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
15 | STOCK Jordan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | DENYSSEVYCH Ivan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
17 | ROBERTS Peter | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
18 | SILKEY Jason | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
19 | PENG Gregory | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
20 | BLOCK B.J. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
21 | ALEXANDER Charles | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
22 | CLAYTON Byron | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
24 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
25 | REED David | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
26 | STERLING William D. | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
27 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | ELLINGTON Jeff B. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
29 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
30 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
32 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | CROPLEY Theodore | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
34 | GARDNER William | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
35 | RICHMOND William (Will) J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
36 | FLY Paul | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | - |
37 | HARGROVE Charles | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
38 | KLEIN Johannes | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | GLYNN Andrew | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
40 | EVANS Allen L. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
41 | KELLY Bradley | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
42 | OLSON McGee | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
43 | POZYWIO Stephen | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
44 | BRAY Bruce | 1% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | CHO Hans | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.