Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 2 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 3 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
| 3 | XIAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 5 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% |
| 6 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 7 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 8 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 9 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 10 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | < 1% |
| 11 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 5% |
| 12 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 13 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 14 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 22% | 2% | |
| 15 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 16 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 17 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
| 18 | BRADY David | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 19 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 21 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 2% |
| 22 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 36% | 4% |
| 24 | LIU Brady | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | WU Connor | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | XU ETHAN | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 35 | SU Sean | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 40 | YOON Mason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | YU Adam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | MOORE Quinn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | GRIFFIN Andrew | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | YOU George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 1% |
| 47 | ZHAO Ethan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | RICHMAN Aaron | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | NAYAK Saideep | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | BETHELMY Daniel | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KOLTAI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 2% | |
| 52 | UPBIN Matthew | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | JIANG Ethan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FOMIN Dash | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.