New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
2 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
3 | CRALEY Thomas M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
3 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
5 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
6 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
7 | SCHULTES Evans | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
8 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
9 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
10 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
11 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
12 | DING Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
13 | DENYSE Jameson | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
14 | KAO Castor T. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
15 | CHAN Tyler | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
16 | SEAH Chad | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
17 | LIAO Alex J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
18 | BATRAK Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
19 | LEE Daniel C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
20 | MARSHALL Ian | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
21 | HEWES Thomas G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
22 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
23 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
24 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
25 | LIU Kevin B. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
26 | BALL James T. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
27 | BOBROW Logan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
28 | BAE Kevin | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
29 | BELLUOMO David C. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | WEI William | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | FU Yifan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | IVARSSON Oliver | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
33 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
34 | CAI Oliver K. | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
35 | CHENG Thomas C. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
36 | GAUDET Paul D. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
37 | ANCONA Christopher | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
38 | AHN Jun | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
39 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
40 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
41 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
42 | WEINKOPF William O. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
43 | BRINTON III Robert H. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
45 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
46 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | DALBERG Leif | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
48 | KIZHNER Fillip | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
48 | LE Vyn A. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
50 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
51 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
52 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | MAGALHAES Alexander | 8% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
54 | FURST Matthew C. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
55 | HILMER Michael | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
56 | SANTULLI Tristan | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
57 | WANG JONATHAN | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | WERWA Griffith | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | ZHAO Jesse | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
60 | WANG Gerald Y. | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
61 | BOUSSY Luciano | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | LIGH Thomas | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
63 | ARANA Massimo | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
64 | GAO Anthony | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
65 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | MENG Zhaoyi | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
67 | BYRNE Finnegan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
68 | DEVAUX Ryan T. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
69 | ROCHE Aidan | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
70 | TORRES Treston | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
72 | NEWTON Luke | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | KEANNA Peter | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
74 | ESPOSITO Matthew | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | BAO Wenyuan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
76 | VENKATESH Aditya | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.