New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | HUANG NATALIE | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 3 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
| 5 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 6 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 43% | 16% | |
| 7 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 52% | 16% |
| 8 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 9 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 51% | 29% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Julie | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 11 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 12 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 13 | WU Celine | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% | |
| 14 | RASO Olivia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% |
| 15 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 16 | FURST Chloe | 1% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | MI Anning | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | WANG Chloe | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 19 | CHENG Angelina | 2% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 21 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | TOBIN Brean | 2% | 38% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 24 | HOU Wendong | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | LENZ Zoe N. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 29 | GAO Zhuning | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | SHMAY Anastasia | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Jasmine | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | MI Aileen | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlyn | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | GAO Anna | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BAMFORD Anna | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | LEVY Avery | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | TANG Sophia | 9% | 41% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | PAULUS Isabella | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | JIANG Claire | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | SEAH Dana | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 44 | SHELDON Lucy A. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 46 | ZHOU Sophia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | UNGERER Frieda | 7% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | AO Alyssa | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | LEE DAYOUNG | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | CHEN Miley | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | DALBERG Meadow | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHENG Rosemary M. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.