New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 2 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 3 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% |
| 5 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 6 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 16% | |
| 7 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 16% |
| 8 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 9 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 32% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 12 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | |
| 13 | WU Celine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
| 14 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% |
| 15 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 16 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 99% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | MI Anning | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | |
| 19 | CHENG Angelina | 100% | 98% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 21 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 98% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 24 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 29 | GAO Zhuning | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 31 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | GAO Anna | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BAMFORD Anna | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | TANG Sophia | 100% | 91% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | SEAH Dana | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 44 | SHELDON Lucy A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 46 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | UNGERER Frieda | 100% | 93% | 58% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | AO Alyssa | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | LEE DAYOUNG | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | CHEN Miley | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | DALBERG Meadow | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHENG Rosemary M. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | 100% | 57% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.