New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V D D V V D | V V V V V | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 2 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 3 | WEHLE Paul | D V D D D | V V V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 5 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | KEEFE Duncan | V D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 7 | OWENS William | D D V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 8 | MORRILL William | D V V D D D | V V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 9 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | MAHONEY Colin M. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | GINIS Nathan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | WIND Nicky E. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 13 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | V V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | CZAHA Balint | D D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 15 | LO Joshua H. | D D D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 16 | MORRILL Justin | V D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | YEN Preston | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | D V V V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 19 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 20 | CHO Brandon | V D V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 21 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | V V D D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 22 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | V V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 23 | ATEFI Daniel | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 24 | TANG Brendan J. | V V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 25 | ELIN Adam E. | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 26 | MENSAH Kennedy C | V V V D D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | V V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 28 | TREJO Oliver | D V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | GARCIA Ryan | V D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | D D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | MARGIL Matthew | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | BELEV Nicholas | D D V V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 34 | WALLACE William Ronan | D D D V V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 35 | LOURENCO Dexter | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | WU Max | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | HO Kaden M. | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 38 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 39 | BLACKBURN Henry | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | ZHANG Yankun | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | GILBERT Spencer E. | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.