New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 2 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 3 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 3 | WEHLE Paul | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 5 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | - | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | KEEFE Duncan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 7 | OWENS William | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 8 | MORRILL William | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 9 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 10 | MAHONEY Colin M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 11 | GINIS Nathan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 47% | 18% |
| 13 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | - | - | 8% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | CZAHA Balint | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 15 | LO Joshua H. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 16 | MORRILL Justin | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | YEN Preston | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 18 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 19 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 20 | CHO Brandon | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 21 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 22 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | ATEFI Daniel | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | TANG Brendan J. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | ELIN Adam E. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MENSAH Kennedy C | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 2% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | TREJO Oliver | 1% | 20% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | GARCIA Ryan | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MARGIL Matthew | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BELEV Nicholas | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | WALLACE William Ronan | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | LOURENCO Dexter | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | WU Max | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | HO Kaden M. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BLACKBURN Henry | 14% | 54% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Yankun | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GILBERT Spencer E. | 69% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.