Matthaei Athletic Facility - Detroit, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| 1 | VOGLER Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 2 | LI Wangjie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 3 | AYUPOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 43% | 12% | |
| 3 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 5 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 9% | |
| 6 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 7 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 8 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 9 | WILKINS Mateo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 10 | MARTIN William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 46% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 12 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 14 | CRALEY Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 88% | 67% | 38% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | ARATA Connor | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 16 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 17 | HIRSCH Bobbie | 100% | 82% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 18 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 19 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |||||
| 20 | LEVITAS-GOREN Eli | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
| 21 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | ||||||
| 22 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |||||
| 23 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | ||||||
| 24 | REECE Oliver | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - | |||||
| 25 | PIERCE Iris W. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 2% | - | ||||||
| 26 | HUNTER Phillip | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.