Southwest Recreation Center - Gainesville, FL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MO Jason | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
2 | IRWIN Peter | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
3 | BRITTNELL Nicolas | V V V | V V V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
3 | SALAZAR Tomas D. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | RIVERA Ivan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | KIMURA Ryo | V V V V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
7 | LEON Nicolas | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
8 | MCMANUS Liam | V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
9 | SHAJI Karthik | V V V V V V | V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
10 | FERRONE Gianna | V V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 6 | +3.9 |
11 | LIAO Anthony J. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
12 | FERRONE Nate | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
13 | OLSON Clayton M. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
14 | RODRIGUEZ Mateo | V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
15 | EXNICIOS Rex | V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
16 | GALLUCCI Julianna | D D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
17 | WERTH Mario | V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
18 | HUSSEY Aidan | V V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
19 | BABER Ijlal | D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
20 | PACHTER Morgan | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
21 | WONG Grace | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
22 | XU Maxwell | V V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
23 | SANDS Cooper | D V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
24 | VENZON Makena Jane | V D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
25 | OCCIANO Jade | D V D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
26 | CREWS Aiden | V V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
27 | SPEARS Scott | V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
28 | SEGURA Matthew | V D D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
29 | OZTEK Muzaffer T. | D D D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
30 | CARRERO Quentin | V D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
31 | LOBEL Dillan | D V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | MARTINGANO Jaiden | D V D V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
33 | CHEN Kent | V V V D D | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
35 | CANTERO Erick | V V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
36 | LATHAM Kallan | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | VILLALOBOS Ava | D D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
38 | FIERRO Elizabeth | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
39 | GIRA Collin | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
40 | FIERRO Michael | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
41 | EKMEKCILER Onur | D D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
42 | PACILIO Jacob | D D V V D D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 | |
43 | RICHARDS Ava | D D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
44 | PATTERSON Emma | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
45 | RYAN SIMONOVICH Mike | D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
46 | LANGSTON Skylar | D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
47 | RYAN SIMONOVICH George 'Yuri' | D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
48 | CHEN Mikayla | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
49 | SABELLA Alex | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
49 | HO Ricky | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
51 | BURMAN Timothy | D D D D V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
52 | OSTEEN Gunnar | D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
53 | CHEN Tyler | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
54 | PLESS Richard | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
55 | LE BLANC Anna | D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
56 | ARIAS-JOHNSON Evan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.