William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | MONTESI Eric | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | YANG Gary | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 5 | BAGHA Armin | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | DUAN eric | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | SO Lorenzo | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | V D V V D D | V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 9 | WALLACE George | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | LIN Harrison | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 11 | PETERS Nathan M. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 12 | MILLER Luke | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | HERMES Henry | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | BLUM Oliver | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 16 | DELONG Joshua | D V D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | PANE Patrick | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | FOREST Sung | V D V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 19 | BANG Dylan | V V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 20 | BADLANI Neel | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SHELLY Emery | V V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | SALLAI Abel | D V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 23 | FEAGIN Patrick | V V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | LE Tan | D D D V V V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 25 | BOZARTH Alex | D V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | BENUCCI Vincent | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | DAVIS Andrew | D D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | MOORE Mary | V D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | HAVERSON Civa | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 30 | ASBY Will | V D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 31 | NEPS Alec | D D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | LUNDEN Espen | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | THOMPSON Conner | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | MATUSIAK JT | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | OGURA Griffin | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 37 | DHINDHWAL KULBIR SINGH | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 38 | CASSIDY Leo | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 39 | KOVARI Kata | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | SOLOMON Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 41 | FISHER Natalie | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.