William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | 
| 2 | MONTESI Eric | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - | 
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | 
| 3 | YANG Gary | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 
| 5 | BAGHA Armin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
| 6 | DUAN eric | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 
| 7 | SO Lorenzo | - | - | 3% | 21% | 55% | 22% | |
| 8 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 44% | 13% | 
| 9 | WALLACE George | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 
| 10 | LIN Harrison | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 10% | 
| 11 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% | 
| 12 | MILLER Luke | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | 
| 13 | HERMES Henry | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 25% | 3% | 
| 14 | BLUM Oliver | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | 
| 15 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 
| 16 | DELONG Joshua | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | 
| 17 | PANE Patrick | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 19% | 2% | 
| 18 | FOREST Sung | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 41% | 6% | 
| 19 | BANG Dylan | - | 21% | 50% | 25% | 3% | - | - | 
| 20 | BADLANI Neel | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | SHELLY Emery | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | 
| 22 | SALLAI Abel | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 23 | FEAGIN Patrick | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | 
| 24 | LE Tan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 
| 25 | BOZARTH Alex | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | 
| 26 | BENUCCI Vincent | 2% | 21% | 50% | 24% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | DAVIS Andrew | 4% | 32% | 44% | 19% | 2% | - | - | 
| 28 | MOORE Mary | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 29 | HAVERSON Civa | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | ASBY Will | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | 
| 31 | NEPS Alec | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | 
| 32 | LUNDEN Espen | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - | 
| 33 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - | 
| 34 | THOMPSON Conner | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - | 
| 35 | MATUSIAK JT | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | 
| 36 | OGURA Griffin | 14% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 37 | DHINDHWAL KULBIR SINGH | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - | 
| 38 | CASSIDY Leo | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | - | - | 
| 39 | KOVARI Kata | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - | 
| 40 | SOLOMON Ethan | 12% | 59% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | FISHER Natalie | 29% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.