Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LEE DoWon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | KIM Gene | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 5 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 6 | KROPP Wesley | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | DANG William | D V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 8 | HERNDON Liam | D D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 9 | SONG Aidan | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | LOISEAU Oscar | V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | WU Matthew | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | SOLOMON Aryeh | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | LIN ZIJIE | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 14 | FONG Kobe | D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 15 | WU MiEr | V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | HUANG Max | D V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | HERDMAN Julian | V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | AU Joshua | D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | V D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | WANG Eason | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | PETERS Keane | V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | TUMULA Arihaan | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | ROBERTS Arthur | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | KIM Remington | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 25 | QU RuiTing | D D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | HANTOV Adrian | D D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | D V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | CHEN Linus | D V D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | KICIMAN Leo | D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | PUTHOFF Henry | D V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | MA Joseph | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 32 | SLAVIN Tamir | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | LEE Wilson | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | JERDEE Colton | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | YAKHNIS Seth | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | KICIMAN Louis | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | DISPENZA Jayan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 38 | KRAVCHENKO Philip | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.