National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% |
| 2 | WEI Vivian W. | 1% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 3 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 3 | MAREK SOFIA | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 5 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 7 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 8 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% | |
| 10 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 31% | |
| 11 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 12 | MIKA Veronica | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | ADEBANKE Niara | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | NG Sarah W. | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 17 | SHI Cathleen | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 18 | JAVERI Amaya | - | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 19 | GRAFF Sophie | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 20 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 20% |
| 23 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 24 | JOHNSON Lydia | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KONG Carys H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 26 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 1% | 11% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | HENRY Soraya S. | 6% | 29% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 30 | WHALEN Paige C. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 31 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 32 | JACOBS Skye | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 33 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
| 34 | WUNNAVA Elina | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | FAN Grace | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 36 | LU Elaine | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% | |
| 37 | SO Catelyn | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | NAYAK Indra | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | CHEN Kevy | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | MARYASH Samantha | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 43 | HUANG Caroline | 7% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 43% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | XU Emily T. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | SCOTT Eve | 48% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YUN Emma | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | COLBY Mercer | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | SUSPITSYNA Alexandra (Sasha) | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CARRASCO Elle | 32% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | ORNELAS Malia | 12% | 55% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | NAZAROVA Arai | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.