Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WILSON Andrew T. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 48% | 39% |
2 | ERIZE Alejandro | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
3 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
3 | ZHOU alex | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
5 | KIM Daniel | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% | |
6 | SEEDS Aidan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
7 | DO Joshua | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
8 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
9 | LEE Winston | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
10 | KUCIA Michael J. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 12% | |
11 | ARZT Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
12 | MARSHALL Wesley | - | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% | |
13 | PARK Andrew | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
14 | CREMONA Diego Maria | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
15 | CUPO Anthony | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
16 | NEWMAN Taylor H. | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 33% | 5% | |
17 | REDDY Daksh | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
18 | KWON Jason | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
19 | TAK Jemi | - | - | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
20 | HUGHES Eric | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 36% |
21 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
22 | OLSON Clayton M. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
23 | MENON Rahul | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
24 | LIU Oscar | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
25 | SORANNO James | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
26 | KHEGAY Martin | - | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
27 | WRIGHT Alex | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
28 | HWANG Brandon | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
29 | BETTS Kieran | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | BALKIR Thomas | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
31 | NGUYEN Joseph | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
32 | WHITE Taylor | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
33 | MEREDITH Jeffrey | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
34 | HERARD Weiman | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
35 | BENTON Kira | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
36 | BATISTA Julian | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 37% | 5% | - |
36 | BEDULLA Asher | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 4% | - |
38 | MARTIN Stella | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | ATON Dave | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
40 | HUANG Arthur | 23% | 51% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | LIGON Arielle | 4% | 24% | 46% | 24% | 2% | - | |
42 | DAILEY John | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | HAWKINS Sophia | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
44 | KARTHIKEYAKANNAN Madhav | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
45 | GRANT Grayson | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
45 | WERTH Mario | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
47 | TAYLOR Benjamin | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
48 | DOUGLAS John | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
49 | PEACOCK Audrey | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
50 | VON KLAR Rhiannon | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | LIU Yunhao | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
52 | HAHN Rebecca | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
53 | LE BLANC Anna | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
54 | DOSS matthew | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | YOUNG III Cecil | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | MA Victor | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
57 | GARRETT John | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | MESNER Talyn | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
59 | SHAKULA Matvey | 8% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
60 | BANJA Michael | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
61 | WANG Aaron | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
62 | KONKEL Broderick | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
63 | SOKOLOWSKI Olivia | 47% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
64 | BARRETT John | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
65 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
66 | KIM Sarah | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.