National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
2 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
3 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
3 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
5 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
6 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
7 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
7 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
9 | WANG Chloe | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 5% |
10 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
11 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% |
12 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
13 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
14 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
15 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
16 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
17 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
18 | ZULUETA Catherine | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
19 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
20 | LEE Lavender | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
21 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
22 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
23 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
24 | FURST Chloe | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
25 | LIN Zhi tong | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
26 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
27 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
28 | MI Aileen | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
29 | WEI Vika | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | LEE Fiona E. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
32 | LI Sophia M. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
33 | SU Michelle | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
34 | HU Felice | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
35 | FU Qihan | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
36 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
37 | CHOW Annabelle | 3% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | COOPER Piper W. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
39 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
39 | BASSIK Eva | 1% | 14% | 46% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | HOANG Mai | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
42 | LEVY Avery | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
43 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
44 | LENZ Zoe N. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
45 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 56% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | DAVIES Ellie | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
47 | ZHANG Elaine | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
48 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
48 | ROY Layla | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
50 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
52 | KOGAN Stella | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
53 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
54 | ZHENG Julie | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
55 | HOANG Anh | 3% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
56 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | SHARMA Anyi | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - |
59 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
60 | KOGAN Alexis | 44% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | ZARE Yasmin | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
62 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | SHIM Grace | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
64 | WALOR Riley H. | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
65 | CASPAR Margot | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
66 | GUEVARRA Isabelle C. | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | ZHAN Eileen | 1% | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
68 | ZHANG Alina | 31% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
69 | NORDQUIST Britt Marie | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.