San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Joy | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
2 | ZHOU Joi | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
3 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 43% |
3 | LI Chelsea | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
5 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
6 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
7 | DING Madison | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
8 | JIN Jada Y | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | - |
9 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% |
10 | DESAI Esha | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
11 | SEAL Ayda | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
12 | HAN Gian | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
13 | YU Sophie | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
14 | XIA Isabella | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | |
15 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
16 | KIM Natalie | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
17 | THERON Zoe | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
18 | YAO Abby | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
19 | CHAN Ella | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
20 | RIGBY Ellie | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
21 | TAN Shouyin | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
22 | LI Audrey | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
23 | LEE Zoe E. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 43% | 14% |
24 | FANG Kelervia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
25 | AHN Hayley | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
26 | WANG Ellen | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
27 | HSU Rachel | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | LIN Allison | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
28 | ZHU Yunyao | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
30 | HOM Avery | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
31 | MANANSALA Zara | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | HUGHES Bailey | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
33 | BALOGH Ayla | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
34 | DVOIRIS Maya | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
35 | CHU Lauren | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | MATVEYEV Julia | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
37 | KULKARNI Myra | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
38 | ARYA Leela | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | TEWARI Amaira | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
40 | OTAEGI Elorri | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
41 | NORRIS Erin | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
42 | JOESUF Aurielle | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | OSENENKO Mia | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | YANG Naomi | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
45 | NEDUNURI Rahini | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.