San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
2 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
3 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
3 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
5 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
6 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
7 | DING Madison | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
8 | JIN Jada Y | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
9 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
10 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
11 | SEAL Ayda | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
12 | HAN Gian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
13 | YU Sophie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
14 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 5% | |
15 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
16 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
17 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
18 | YAO Abby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
19 | CHAN Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
20 | RIGBY Ellie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
21 | TAN Shouyin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
22 | LI Audrey | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
23 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
24 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
25 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
26 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
27 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | LIN Allison | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | ZHU Yunyao | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
30 | HOM Avery | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
31 | MANANSALA Zara | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
32 | HUGHES Bailey | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | |
33 | BALOGH Ayla | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | DVOIRIS Maya | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
35 | CHU Lauren | 100% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | MATVEYEV Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
37 | KULKARNI Myra | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
40 | OTAEGI Elorri | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
41 | NORRIS Erin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
42 | JOESUF Aurielle | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | OSENENKO Mia | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | YANG Naomi | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | NEDUNURI Rahini | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.