National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
2 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
3 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
3 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
5 | YERMOLENKO Liza | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
6 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% |
7 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
8 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
9 | GU Sarah | - | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
10 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
11 | HENRY Asha S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
12 | MUCSI Angela Lilla | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
13 | ZHU Heidi | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
14 | PALMER Amelia C. | 2% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
16 | KIM Diane E. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
17 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
18 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
19 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
20 | WU Fan | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
21 | PYO Yunice | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
22 | DE JAGER Celine | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
23 | KIM Caroline | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
25 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
26 | CHENG Ava | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
27 | LONG Cindy | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 6% |
28 | TOLBA Salma | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | LEE kyungmin | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
30 | NING Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
31 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
32 | MAO Amy | 3% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
33 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
33 | CHU Audrey | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
35 | MUCSI Anna M. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
36 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
37 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
38 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
39 | ZHANG Tina | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
40 | REITINGER Emilie B. | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
41 | LEE Michelle | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
42 | GAO Judy | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
43 | REID Sobia | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
44 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
45 | CHAWLA Ishika | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
46 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
47 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
48 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
49 | ZHAO Yingying | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
50 | WU ALLYSON | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
51 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - |
52 | TONG Sarah Shen | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
53 | KIM Erika S. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
54 | PALANSKI Cate | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
55 | LEE Olive | - | 5% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - |
56 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
57 | MATHEZ-PELLERIN Amanda | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | - |
58 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
59 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SHEN Stephanie | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
61 | CHOI Yuni D. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
62 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
63 | OSTROVSKY Emily I. | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
64 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 15% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
65 | BLIN Margaux J. | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
66 | WAGMAN Agatha E. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
68 | NAYAK Mira | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
69 | ZENG Katrina | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
70 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 3% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
71 | DILLE Carolina G. | 19% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | MING Cynthia | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
73 | LEE Anna | 31% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
74 | VALLURI Rithi H. | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
75 | DREFKE Sigrid | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
76 | MCLAREN Rachel | 20% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | XU Jessica | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | FLO Sena | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | GLICK Nina | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
80 | RAI Ananya | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | OHL Emily | 71% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
82 | KABRHEL Sadie | 25% | 50% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
83 | MACEDON Gianna | 72% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.