Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Cadet Women's Épée

Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HUSISIAN Hadley N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
2 PARK Faith K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
3 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
3 JOYCE Michaela 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
5 YERMOLENKO Liza 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
6 TYLER Syd 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56% 14%
7 SMITH Grace L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 81% 41% 8%
8 PATURU Meghana 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
9 GU Sarah 100% 100% 100% 91% 61% 23% 4%
10 DING Jiahe (Heidi) 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 33%
11 HENRY Asha S. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
12 MUCSI Angela Lilla 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
13 ZHU Heidi 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 16%
14 PALMER Amelia C. 100% 98% 84% 42% 9% 1% -
15 CHAN Elizabeth 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 27% 4%
16 KIM Diane E. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 13%
17 DESAMOURS Sabine I. 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 21% 3%
18 WATRALL Christina 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
19 GABERKORN Nadia 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
20 WU Fan 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 15% 2%
21 PYO Yunice 100% 100% 100% 93% 66% 27% 5%
22 DE JAGER Celine 100% 92% 62% 23% 4% < 1% -
23 KIM Caroline 100% 98% 85% 51% 17% 2% -
24 MEHROTRA Anya 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 9%
25 LEUNG Natalie 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 4%
26 CHENG Ava 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7%
27 LONG Cindy 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 6%
28 TOLBA Salma 100% 99% 88% 58% 21% 3%
29 LEE kyungmin 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 22% 2%
30 NING Emma 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 5%
31 SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 14%
32 MAO Amy 100% 97% 69% 27% 5% - -
33 ZUHARS Renee A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 19%
33 CHU Audrey 100% 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 1%
35 MUCSI Anna M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 2%
36 DESAI Meera P. 100% 100% 93% 69% 33% 9% 1%
37 CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40%
38 GUMAGAY Erika L. 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 10% 1%
39 ZHANG Tina 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 4%
40 REITINGER Emilie B. 100% 100% 93% 68% 30% 6% -
41 LEE Michelle 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 12%
42 GAO Judy 100% 96% 74% 37% 10% 1%
43 REID Sobia 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 8% 1%
44 CHERNYSHOVA Victoria 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3%
45 CHAWLA Ishika 100% 98% 83% 46% 13% 1% -
46 CHIN Isabella 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 12%
47 KUZNETSOV Victoria 100% 100% 100% 91% 63% 25% 4%
48 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) 100% 100% 99% 83% 47% 14% 2%
49 ZHAO Yingying 100% 98% 83% 46% 14% 2% -
50 WU ALLYSON 100% 79% 34% 6% 1% - -
51 EBRAHIM Ameera H. 100% 100% 94% 64% 22% 3% -
52 TONG Sarah Shen 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 11% 1%
53 KIM Erika S. 100% 87% 52% 17% 3% -
54 PALANSKI Cate 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
55 LEE Olive 100% 100% 95% 61% 22% 4% -
56 BELAOUSSOFF Kira 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 3%
57 MATHEZ-PELLERIN Amanda 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 10% -
58 KIM Elizabeth Y. 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% 1%
59 PAYNE Elizabeth 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
60 SHEN Stephanie 100% 99% 87% 56% 21% 4% -
61 CHOI Yuni D. 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% -
62 RUNIONS Emersyn 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 25% 3%
63 OSTROVSKY Emily I. 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% - -
64 BAJAJ Nikita K. 100% 85% 45% 13% 2% - -
65 BLIN Margaux J. 100% 92% 59% 19% 3% - -
66 WAGMAN Agatha E. 100% 88% 54% 19% 3% - -
68 NAYAK Mira 100% 80% 38% 9% 1% - -
69 ZENG Katrina 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
70 ELLENT Isabella S. 100% 97% 66% 24% 4% - -
71 DILLE Carolina G. 100% 81% 23% 3% - - -
72 MING Cynthia 100% 73% 27% 4% - - -
73 LEE Anna 100% 69% 20% 2% - - -
74 VALLURI Rithi H. 100% 28% 3% - - - -
75 DREFKE Sigrid 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% - -
76 MCLAREN Rachel 100% 80% 18% 2% - - -
77 XU Jessica 100% 54% 12% 1% - - -
78 FLO Sena 100% 64% 17% 2% - - -
79 GLICK Nina 100% 69% 23% 4% - - -
80 RAI Ananya 100% 64% 17% 2% - - -
81 OHL Emily 100% 29% 1% - - - -
82 KABRHEL Sadie 100% 75% 25% 4% - - -
83 MACEDON Gianna 100% 28% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.