National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
2 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
3 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
3 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
5 | YERMOLENKO Liza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
6 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 14% |
7 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% |
8 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
9 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% |
10 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
11 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
12 | MUCSI Angela Lilla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
13 | ZHU Heidi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
14 | PALMER Amelia C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - |
15 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
16 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
17 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
18 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
19 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
20 | WU Fan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
21 | PYO Yunice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% |
22 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - |
23 | KIM Caroline | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
24 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
25 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
26 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
27 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% |
28 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
29 | LEE kyungmin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
30 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
31 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
32 | MAO Amy | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
33 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
33 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
35 | MUCSI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
36 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
37 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
38 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
39 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
40 | REITINGER Emilie B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
41 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% | |
42 | GAO Judy | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
44 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
45 | CHAWLA Ishika | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
46 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 12% |
47 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
48 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
49 | ZHAO Yingying | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
50 | WU ALLYSON | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
51 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
52 | TONG Sarah Shen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
53 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
54 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
55 | LEE Olive | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - |
56 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
57 | MATHEZ-PELLERIN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | - |
58 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
59 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
61 | CHOI Yuni D. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
62 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
63 | OSTROVSKY Emily I. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
64 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
65 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
66 | WAGMAN Agatha E. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
68 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
69 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
70 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 100% | 97% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
71 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 81% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
73 | LEE Anna | 100% | 69% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
74 | VALLURI Rithi H. | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
75 | DREFKE Sigrid | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
76 | MCLAREN Rachel | 100% | 80% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | XU Jessica | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | FLO Sena | 100% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | GLICK Nina | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
80 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | OHL Emily | 100% | 29% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
82 | KABRHEL Sadie | 100% | 75% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
83 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.