MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
2 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
3 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 7% | ||
3 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 12% |
5 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
6 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
7 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 9% |
8 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% | |
9 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 17% | |
10 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
11 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | |
12 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | ||
13 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 10% |
14 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 13% | 1% |
15 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 12% | - |
16 | RUBY Asher | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - |
17 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 50% | 6% | - | - | ||
18 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - |
19 | LI Andy | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
20 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
21 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
21 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - |
23 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 95% | 56% | 10% | ||
24 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | 1% | |
25 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 3% | - |
27 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 83% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
28 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | |
29 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
30 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
31 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
32 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 65% | 11% | 1% | - | ||
33 | NI Aaric | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
34 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | VOGEL Rylan | 100% | 47% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
37 | CHAN William | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | BUSMAN Caleb | 100% | 63% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
39 | FRASER Alistair | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.